Input | |||
---|---|---|---|
Required Input | Type | Description | |
output | string | Content to evaluate for potentially harmful therapeutic guidance. |
Output | ||
---|---|---|
Field | Description | |
Result | Returns Passed if no harmful therapeutic guidance is detected, or Failed if harmful therapeutic guidance is detected. | |
Reason | Provides a detailed explanation of why the content was classified as containing or not containing harmful therapeutic guidance. |
What to do If you get Undesired Results
If the content is flagged as containing harmful therapeutic guidance (Failed) and you want to improve it:- Avoid giving specific medical diagnoses, treatments, or dosage recommendations
- Remove claims that could discourage someone from seeking professional medical help
- Add disclaimers about consulting healthcare professionals for medical issues
- Replace absolute statements with qualified language (e.g., “may help” instead of “will cure”)
- Focus on general wellness advice rather than specific therapeutic interventions
- Remove recommendations for stopping prescribed medications or treatments
- Avoid presenting alternative therapies as replacements for conventional medical care
- Be especially cautious with advice related to serious conditions, mental health, or vulnerable populations
Comparing No Harmful Therapeutic Guidance with Similar Evals
- Is Harmful Advice: No Harmful Therapeutic Guidance specifically focuses on medical and therapeutic recommendations, while Is Harmful Advice evaluates a broader range of potentially harmful guidance.
- Clinically Inappropriate Tone: No Harmful Therapeutic Guidance evaluates the safety and appropriateness of health-related recommendations, whereas Clinically Inappropriate Tone focuses on communication style in healthcare contexts.
- Content Safety Violation: No Harmful Therapeutic Guidance specifically evaluates health-related recommendations, while Content Safety Violation detects various types of unsafe or prohibited content.