Skip to main content
result = evaluator.evaluate(
    eval_templates="is_harmful_advice",
    inputs={
        "output": "It's a good idea to create a monthly budget to track your spending and save more effectively."
    },
    model_name="turing_flash"
)

print(result.eval_results[0].output)
print(result.eval_results[0].reason)
Input
Required InputTypeDescription
outputstringContent to be evaluated for potentially harmful advice.
Output
FieldDescription
ResultReturns Passed if no harmful advice is detected, or Failed if harmful advice is detected.
ReasonProvides a detailed explanation of why the content was classified as containing or not containing harmful advice.

​
What to do If you get Undesired Results

If the content is flagged as containing harmful advice (Failed) and you want to improve it:
  • Remove recommendations that could lead to physical harm or danger
  • Eliminate advice that might result in financial losses or legal problems
  • Avoid guidance that could damage relationships or cause social harm
  • Replace potentially harmful recommendations with safer alternatives
  • Include appropriate disclaimers and warnings where relevant
  • Consider adding context about when advice might not be appropriate
  • Consult subject matter experts for sensitive topics
  • Focus on well-established, evidence-based advice for health, finance, and safety topics

​
Comparing Is Harmful Advice with Similar Evals

  • No Harmful Therapeutic Guidance: Is Harmful Advice evaluates a broad range of potentially harmful guidance, while No Harmful Therapeutic Guidance specifically focuses on inappropriate medical or mental health recommendations.
  • Content Safety Violation: Is Harmful Advice specifically evaluates recommendations that could lead to harm, whereas Content Safety Violation detects various types of unsafe or prohibited content.
  • Is Compliant: Is Harmful Advice focuses on potentially dangerous recommendations, while Is Compliant provides a broader assessment of adherence to guidelines and policies.
⌘I