Ensure Safe and Inclusive AI
As AI models become increasingly integrated into everyday applications, ensuring their outputs are safe, inclusive, and aligned with ethical standards is essential. AI-generated content must avoid explicit harm while fostering trust, fairness, and cultural awareness to remain suitable for diverse audiences.
Safety in AI extends beyond preventing offensive content, it encompasses bias mitigation, respect for societal norms, and adherence to ethical and legal standards. A well-moderated AI system enhances user confidence, minimising risks of discrimination, misinformation, or inappropriate language, while ensuring AI remains reliable, socially responsible, and widely accessible.
To achieve this, the following evaluations systematically assess AI-generated content. These assessments create a structured framework to ensure that AI-driven communication is ethical, respectful, and suitable for all users:
- Tone
- Sexist
- Toxicity
- Content Moderation
- Bias Detection
- Cultural Sensitivity
- Safe for Work Text
- Not Gibberish Text
1. Tone
Evaluates the sentiment of content to ensure it’s appropriate for the given context.
Click here to read the eval definition of Tone
a. Using Interface
Required Parameters
- Input: The text content to evaluate for tone
Output: Returns tag such as “neutral”, “joy”, etc whatever tag that indicates the dominant emotional tone detected in the content
b. Using SDK
2. Sexist
Identifies content with gender bias or sexist language. Checks for use of stereotypes or discriminatory language or the content has imbalanced representation or assumptions based on gender.
Click here to read the eval definition of Sexist
a. Using Interface
Required Parameters
- Input: The text content to check for sexist content
Output: Returns either “Passed” or “Failed”, where “Passed” indicates no sexist content detected, “Failed” indicates presence of gender bias or discriminatory language
b. Using SDK
3. Toxicity
Evaluates content for toxic, harmful, or aggressive language. Such as use of profanity, threats, or abusive language. Content that could harm user relationships or escalate conflicts.
Click here to read the eval definition of Toxicity
a. Using Interface
Required Parameters
- Input: The text content to analyse for toxic content
Output: Returns either “Passed” or “Failed”, where “Passed” indicates non-toxic content, “Failed” indicates presence of harmful or aggressive language
b. Using SDK
4. Content Moderation
Evaluates content safety using OpenAI’s content moderation system to detect and flag potentially harmful, inappropriate, or unsafe content
Click here to read the eval definition of Content Moderation
a. Using Interface
Required Parameters
- Text: The text content to moderate
Output: Returns Float between 0 and 1. Higher values indicate safer content, lower values indicate potentially inappropriate content
b. Using SDK
5. Bias Detection
Identifies biases in the output, including gender, racial, cultural, or ideological biases. An ideal AI generated response must be neutral language use without favouring or discriminating against any group.
Click here to read the eval definition of Bias Detection
a. Using Interface
Required Parameters
- Input: The text content to analyse for bias
Output: Returns either “Passed” or “Failed”, where “Passed” indicates neutral content, “Failed” indicates presence of bias.
b. Using SDK
6. Cultural Sensitivity
Analyses the output for cultural appropriateness, inclusive language, and awareness of cultural nuances.
Click here to read the eval definition of Cultural Sensitivity
a. Using Interface
Required Parameters
- Input: The text content to analyse for cultural appropriateness
Output: Returns either “Passed” or “Failed”, where “Passed” indicates culturally appropriate content, “Failed” indicates potential cultural insensitivity
b. Using SDK
7. Safe for Work Text
Ensures the text is appropriate for professional environments, since the AI response should have absence of explicit, offensive, or overly personal content.
Click here to read the eval definition of Safe for Work Text
a. Using Interface
Required Parameters
- Response: The text content to evaluate for workplace appropriateness
Output: Returns either “Passed” or “Failed”, where “Passed” indicates safe for work text and “Failed” indicates not safe for work text.
b. Using SDK
8. Not Gibberish Text
Validates that the text is coherent and meaningful. Absence of nonsensical or garbled content and has logical structure and readability.
Click here to read the eval definition of Not Gibberish Text
a. Using Interface
Required Parameters
- Response: The text content to evaluate for coherence
Output: Returns float between 0 and 1. Higher values indicate more coherent and meaningful content.
b. Using SDK
By integrating these evaluation methods, AI systems can consistently produce responsible, reliable, and socially aware outputs that enhance user trust and engagement.