Definition

Determines whether a given text conforms to a valid JSON format. Ensuring valid JSON formatting is critical for seamless data interoperability, as incorrect structures can lead to parsing errors and system failures.

The evaluation returns a Pass if the text is correctly formatted and can be parsed without errors. A Fail indicates structural issues that prevent proper JSON parsing, requiring corrections to ensure compliance with the format’s syntax rules.


Calculation

The evaluation process begins by receiving the text input to assess its JSON validity. A JSON parser attempts to parse the input, checking for proper structural elements such as correctly placed brackets and braces, valid key-value pair syntax, appropriate use of commas and colons, and properly formatted strings enclosed in double quotes.

If the parser detects any structural errors, such as missing commas or unexpected characters, it identifies the specific issue preventing successful parsing. The evaluation passes if no errors are found, while any parsing failures result in a failed evaluation.


What to do when JSON Validation Fails

Identify common structural problems, such as missing commas, misplaced brackets, or incorrect key-value formatting, should be corrected accordingly.

To prevent future errors, implementing automated checks within the system can help detect and resolve formatting issues before processing.


Differentiating Between Is JSON Eval with JSON Schema Validation

“Is JSON” evaluation focuses solely on structural validity, ensuring that data follows basic JSON syntax, such as correct use of brackets, commas, and quotes. In contrast, JSON Schema Validation goes beyond syntax by checking adherence to predefined schema rules, including data types, required fields, and value constraints.

The “Is JSON” check is simpler, as it only requires parsing the data, whereas JSON Schema Validation is more complex, involving validation against a structured schema.